Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces and URIs (was: A good case for Namespace URIs)

[Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>]

Seairth Jacobs wrote:

> why don't we just come up with
> a new scheme to use instead of "http".  For instance, we could have "xmlns".
> Then, when seeing "xmlns://www.govtalk.gov.uk/CR/core" or preferably
> "xmlns://govtalk.gov.uk/CR/core", we would know that the URL is not
> resolvable (at least using HTTP). At the same time, organizations can
> continue to use the URL format for its conveniences.

I like this a lot.

-- Ron