Re: RE: RE: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XMLdoesn'tdese rve its "X".)

[Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>]

3/5/2002 4:05:22 PM, "John Evdemon" <jevdemon@vitria.com> wrote:

  
>Isn't the phrase well-formed XML a bit redundant?
>

I'd guess that Simon meant "without a DTD or schema to 
imply all the bits that would have to be serialized
without them."  All legal XML is well-formed, so the 
"well-formed" qualifier generally means "no
DTD/Schema."