[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 06:22 AM 3/15/02, Len Bullard wrote:
>Maybe I am just getting foggy in my dotage, but do we
>need Xlinks if we use relational dbs and if so, for what
>other than perhaps a convenient transport representation?
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." If you've got a linkbase that works
fine now, go with it - there is no need for you to use XLink except, as you
say, as "a convenient transport representation."
Of course, in many senses, XML itself is "just" a "convenient transport
representation," with data coming from databases, generated from the state
of some process, or otherwise not existing natively as pointy brackets.
Of course, I think you knew this - but thanks for the leading question. (-:
~Chris
- --
Christopher R. Maden, Principal Consultant, crism consulting
DTDs/schemas - conversion - ebooks - publishing - Web - B2B - training
<URL: http://crism.maden.org/consulting/ >
PGP Fingerprint: BBA6 4085 DED0 E176 D6D4 5DFC AC52 F825 AFEC 58DA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8
iQA/AwUBPJOEC6xS+CWv7FjaEQLesQCgpkoNiEVPvkSKoSkfrLgKP4s/ZqAAoNhR
y1If1dFvQ127GoIwozEEUZZH
=A8Z5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- References:
- XLinks
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
|
