Lists Home |
Date Index |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Brennan [mailto:Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:16 PM
> To: 'Jonathan Robie'; email@example.com
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
> > From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> > Er, do they really call it a "reference implementation"?
> Er, no. But Dare's message "nominating" Microsoft's
> implementations as good examples of conforming processors
> somehow got transcribed in my mind into an offer nominating
> their implementations as reference implementations.
> Sorry. My mistake.
> It would still be terribly nice to see some release notes,
> though, explaining what's different between 4.0 SP1 and RTM.
> We've been burned by "bug fix" patches before. I'd like to
> know why we should upgrade.
I'm working on getting this out as soon as possible.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2001 Microsoft Corporation. All