[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Yep - I've done quite a lot of work on Schemas with both (.NET and MSXML)
and found compliance to be very good.
Although i am guessing the latest SP1 for MSXML brought even more compliance
(i guess coz i can't find a resource that details the updates), I haven't
heard too many rumblings about non-compliance.
cheers,
Steven
http://deltabis.com/steven
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@softwareag.com>
To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>; "Paul Spencer"
<paul.spencer@alphaxml.com>; "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@dyomedea.com>;
<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:59 PM
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
> At 11:56 AM 3/20/2002 -0800, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>
> >The big selling point of XML is that it allows interoperability which we
> >who work on the XML technologies at Microsoft are behind 100%.
> >
> >Thus I nominate our implementations (XmlValidatingReader in .NET and
> >MSXML) as validating processors that do a good job of following the XML
> >Schema recommendation.
>
> Anybody outside of Microsoft have enough experience with this software to
> comment on the compatibility of these tools with the XML Schema spec?
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
|
