OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

We're seeing increased interest and some of it is coming 
in the form of Schemas, not interest in schemas.  
There are efforts in legal systems, other justice 
systems, and in message formats national and state 
to state communications.  We also have a conservative 
user base, but one with international problems.

Given we use relational technology, Schemas are a 
straightforward way to get certain jobs done.  
I found XML Spy with it's ODBC utility to be 
good for getting the job started.  After that, 
one begins to discover the problems in the 
original source table definitions and XML Schema 
plus a tool is good for outing those.  Automagic 
only goes so far.

I admit freely that our uninitiated with oop backgrounds 
ignore schemas until it is too late.  The instance 
fragment I posted the other day is an example of 
what can happen.   XML is very flexible and that 
can be a wonderful and terrible thing given the passion 
to rush to coding out of an eight hour introductory class.

With regards to MS XML documentation: it appears that 
MS uses a lot of automation to organize its site.  That's 
just a guess.  Because MS has created and used or discarded 
a lot of technologies, it can be difficult to sort out which 
one applies when to a particular problem.  Also, while 
Terrarium and the like are fascinating (the use of 
ecosystem metaphors for web services: whoda guessed), 
MS needs to spend the time and money to re-organize its 
XML documentation and training assets into one that leads 
the user skillfully through the learning curve.  It does this 
well in parts (eg, the project series types), but this is 
all scattered about.  Sometime should be spent refocusing and 
planning a coherent presentation, and possibly retiring some of the 
older articles.  The reference material is generally good, 
the problem reports useful, etc., but the smooth entry from 
newbie to guru, not so smooth.

No more FatMSBooksDoomedToBeDoorstopsInSixMonths.


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Brennan [mailto:Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com]

I have no hard statistics, but given that we are finding that our customer
base is showing interest in XML Schema, and our customer base represents a
somewhat conservative (with respect to technology) segment of the market, I
would say that the speculative claim of about 1% of users using XML Schema
is extremly dubious -- and even those not currently using XML Schema often
have plans to start using it. If I were to extrapolate from our customer
base, I would put the estimate at closer to the 10-20% range and growing.


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS