[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Michael Kay wrote:
> (Of course there are solutions like using processing instructions or
> quoted-printable encoding. But I haven't heard any good argument why I
> shouldn't be able to use XML character references to represent these
> characters, which would seem a much more natural approach.
Er, I offered one, which I believe the next sentence is an attempt
to refute
> In any case, the
> semantics of BEL are at least as well-defined as TAB.)
EOT. ETX. QED. -Tim
|