Lists Home |
Date Index |
So is there any sort of guaranteed or implied turn-around time for
responses to questions on the W3C XML Schema Comments List? It's been
about 5 days since I made a few posts but given that it took about 2
weeks to get a response on the XQuery comments list I don't know if this
is unusual or business as usual.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:51 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo; Paul Spencer; Eric van der Vlist;
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
> At 11:56 AM 3/20/2002 -0800, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> >There are for a for doing this already including product newsgroups,
> >XMLSCHEMA-DEV and the simply reporting bugs to the vendors
> in question.
> Please note that the XML Schema Comments list is the only
> mailing list that
> members of the W3C XML Schema Working Group are required to read and
> respond to. If you want to make us formally responsible for
> dealing with
> your feedback, you should post to the comments list. Here is the list
> W3C XML Schema Comments List
> Archives: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/
> Email address: email@example.com
> *** PLEASE *** post bugs in the XML Schema spec itself to the
> above list.
> Note - this list is now spam-free, as of the middle of the month.
> The list to which Dare refers is a W3C mailing list for XML Schema
> developers. Here is the information for that list:
> W3C XML Schema Developer's List
> Archives: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/
> Nobody has any formal obligation to respond to anything on
> this list. I do
> not know to what extent you can count on finding a
> representative of a
> given company on the above list. However, the discussion on
> the above list
> is active, interesting, and helpful.