[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
So is there any sort of guaranteed or implied turn-around time for
responses to questions on the W3C XML Schema Comments List? It's been
about 5 days since I made a few posts but given that it took about 2
weeks to get a response on the XQuery comments list I don't know if this
is unusual or business as usual.
Thanks.
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All
rights reserved.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@softwareag.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:51 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo; Paul Spencer; Eric van der Vlist;
> xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?
>
>
> At 11:56 AM 3/20/2002 -0800, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>
> >There are for a for doing this already including product newsgroups,
> >XMLSCHEMA-DEV and the simply reporting bugs to the vendors
> in question.
>
>
> Please note that the XML Schema Comments list is the only
> mailing list that
> members of the W3C XML Schema Working Group are required to read and
> respond to. If you want to make us formally responsible for
> dealing with
> your feedback, you should post to the comments list. Here is the list
> information:
>
> W3C XML Schema Comments List
> Archives: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/
> Email address: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
>
> *** PLEASE *** post bugs in the XML Schema spec itself to the
> above list.
> Note - this list is now spam-free, as of the middle of the month.
>
>
> The list to which Dare refers is a W3C mailing list for XML Schema
> developers. Here is the information for that list:
>
> W3C XML Schema Developer's List
> Archives: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/
>
> Nobody has any formal obligation to respond to anything on
> this list. I do
> not know to what extent you can count on finding a
> representative of a
> given company on the above list. However, the discussion on
> the above list
> is active, interesting, and helpful.
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
|
