[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 17:33, Richard Tobin wrote:
> >Is there a good argument why Namespaces-1.1 *shouldn't* be rolled
> >into the XML-1.1 req/draft?
>
> A true unification of the XML and Namespaces spec would only make
> sense if various other things were done, in particular dealing with
> the special-case "pseudo-namespaced" attributes xml:lang and
> xml:space. This would be a good thing, but we decided not to add that
> to our task-list right now.
I guess I'm just curious - what exactly does "deal with... xml:lang and
xml:space" mean?
I thought Namespaces in XML already defined a namespace for them in
section 4...
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com
|
