[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Marcus Carr wrote:
>
> ..
>
> The change would mean that:
>
> DTDs are unable to play with namespaces, so they are not capable of
> fully supporting the v1.1 recommendation. Ergo, DTDs should be dropped
> as they have been rendered incomplete and confusing.
>
one alternative is to standardize a mechanism for interpreting qualified
names in a dtd.
...
|