[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote:
> "An underclass already exists..."
>
> So without any substantial benefit, we rig a standard
> to create a permanent underclass?
>
> Ummm.... that's nuts.
Agreed. But since the underclass already exists, moving namespaces into
the XML 1.1 spec has no effect on this. (Similarly, leaving it out does
not make the underclass any less permanent.) The way to get rid of the
underclass is to get DTDs and namespaces to play together.
-- Ron
|