Lists Home |
Date Index |
At 12:04 PM 4/5/2002 -0800, Ronald Bourret wrote:
>Ann Navarro wrote:
> > At 03:57 PM 4/4/2002 -0800, Ronald Bourret wrote:
> > >But that's just it. Every system layer above them does depend on them.
> > >Adding them to the core is just formalizing the status quo.
> > They do? I guess I better go tell my clients that their systems are broken,
> > and they don't even know it (not a one of them *depends* on namespaces)
>Just because you don't use namespaces doesn't
>mean they aren't there.
I won't argue that they're not there in an existential way, but that's not
the same as saying *every system layer *depends* on them*
Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc.
What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/