[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Matthew Gertner scripsit:
> I would have expected the
> W3C to take a more open stance and revise it if events prove this to be
> necessary (and I will give very attractive odds if someone wants to bet that
> this would be the case).
That is indeed (or so I believe) in progress, but the W3C is unwilling
to impose openness, *especially* retroactively, on its WGs.
--
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
|
