Every
XSLT processor has its own set of extensions, and its own mechanisms to allow
users to define extensions. By definition, these are not standardised. However,
there has been a tendency for each implementation to copy the extensions
provided by others: those available in Xalan are pretty well a subset of those
in Saxon, which led the way on many of the popular extensions like multiple
output files and xx:evaluate(); and there is also a third-party library of
portable extensions provided at www.exslt.org.
Michael Kay
Software AG
home:
Michael.H.Kay@ntlworld.com
work: Michael.Kay@softwareag.com
Are Xalan extensions a standard feature on XSLT
processors?
What other XSLT processor
implements?
Thanks!
|
