[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 01:10 25/4/02, Michael Kay wrote:
>I think there's another reason as well: I wasn't involved with XSLT at the
>time, but my impression has always been that the original WG worked in a
>rather different way from most standards groups. I may be simplifying, but
>it operated, as far as I can tell, with one person (James Clark) as the
>acknowledged chief designer, and the rest of the group acting primarily in a
>supporting role.
That's a fair description, but part of the reason for that is precisely
because XSLT was a distillation of lessons learned from James's extensions
to DSSSL in Jade. With his element and attribute pseudo--flow-objects, no
one really needed the full transformation language, and that was the best
practice distilled by XSLT. XPath was also a best-practices distillation,
from URLs, directory navigation, TEI pointers, and CSS and other stylesheet
languages' selectors.
There was some innovation, to be sure, but the success rate there was about
the same as for other such ventures (for instance, the result-tree fragment
goof-up).
~Chris
- --
Christopher R. Maden, Principal Consultant, crism consulting
DTDs/schemas - conversion - ebooks - publishing - Web - B2B - training
<URL: http://crism.maden.org/consulting/ >
PGP Fingerprint: BBA6 4085 DED0 E176 D6D4 5DFC AC52 F825 AFEC 58DA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8
iQA/AwUBPMfMTKxS+CWv7FjaEQJq4wCdEV+B3ScMky7wQe0QPui5n5fq2QUAnikl
VQe0XIHVHEK7+QZImAxp9g9/
=rliP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|