xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )

Re: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )
From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:32:10 -0400
In-reply-to: <014101c1ed27$c495bea0$4bc8a8c0@AlletteSystems.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020426085858.04625ea8@pop.mindspring.com>

At 11:39 PM 4/26/2002 +1000, Rick Jelliffe wrote:

>But someone who wants to do that presumably wants to support large 
>structures.
>And since XML was only developed to allow documents (presumably small ones)
>to be sent over the Web,

Why do you say presumably small?

Ann

Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc.
http://www.webgeek.com/
What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/	
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )
  - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )
  - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>

Prev by Date: RE: Fwd: Re: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )
Next by Date: Re: Fwd: Re: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread