[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Actually, I was asking what the reasons are, i.e. those impedence mismatches.
Rex
At 2:46 PM -0700 5/1/02, Paul Prescod wrote:
>Rex Brooks wrote:
>>
>>. ..The fact that it anticipates asynchronous
>> functionality is IMHO the single most necessary feature for what is
>> called web services.
>
>SOAP "anticipates" asynchronous functionality in roughly the same sense
>that Unicode does. i.e. it says: "that's not our problem."
>
>I can do that with HTTP also.
>
>> ... Since REST is an architecture and SOAP is
>> package wrapper method, are there reasons why SOAP could not fit
>> inside REST?
>
>That's what the TAG is trying to do. But it's a little bit like saying:
>"object oriented programming is a paradigm and awk is a programming
>language. Can't we just use the programming language according to the
>paradigm?" You have to address the impedence mismatches.
>
> Paul Prescod
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
--
|
