[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
From: "Richard Tobin" <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
> Much more compact ones are possible (and as Rick points out, it
> would be much nicer is we had structured attributes!).
Yes, probably I should have just said "meta-attributes" though; structured
attributes per se are another issue. A psvi attribute represented by a psvi:attribute
element in the actual XML would still be atomic, and the psvi augmentations would
all be attributes in the actual XML.
Cheers
Rick
|