xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization

RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization
From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:33:49 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <E1765nZ-0005IE-00@calvin.frontwire.com>





> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alaric Snell [mailto:alaric@alaric-snell.com] 
>
> I usually find that multimedia is a good example - audio and 
> video and images 
> are not good candidates for XML storage, and they (certainly 
> images at least) 
> account for a LOT of the information being exchanged over the 
> Web today!

True (see SOAP+attachmemts). XML is a good candidate for sending
metadata about binary data.

Bill de hÓra

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization
  - From: Alaric Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread