xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization

Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization
From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 08:53:28 -0400
References: <000601c1f805$cb531830$887ba8c0@mitchum>

[Bill de hÓra]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alaric Snell [mailto:alaric@alaric-snell.com]
>
> I usually find that multimedia is a good example - audio and
> video and images
> are not good candidates for XML storage, and they (certainly
> images at least)
> account for a LOT of the information being exchanged over the
> Web today!

True (see SOAP+attachmemts). XML is a good candidate for sending
metadata about binary data.

As in MPEG-7, if I understand things right.

Cheers,

Tom P

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization
  - From: Claude Seyrat <claude.seyrat@expway.fr>
- Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization
  - From: Alaric Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization
  - From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread