Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?

[Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>]

At 12:35 PM 5/10/2002 +0100, Jeni Tennison wrote:
>I do think that it's a lot easier to add features to a language than
>it is to take them away; XPath 2.0 should be *core* functionality, not
>XQuery minus node-constructors. And the other users of XPath --
>XPointers, XForms, XML Schema, should be considered as well.

I think most people seem to be agreeing with you.

Does anyone disagree?

Jonathan