xml-dev - [Off-Topic] Invisible Foot (Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0

[Off-Topic] Invisible Foot (Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumpt

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: [Off-Topic] Invisible Foot (Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions)
From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 04:24:57 +1000
References: <1V2XORZX2YE9B8YWQM82SPPPMB63.3cde8437@MChamp> <1861755499334.20020512172932@jenitennison.com>

From: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@jenitennison.com>

> What can we do to help Mother Nature, Father Darwin and the Invisible
> Hand (strange mental picture, that) on their course?

For any XML-DEVers interested in economic theory, there is quite a nice 
discussion of E.K. Hunt's argument that Smith's Inviible Hand is accompanied 
by an Invisible Foot,  at  http://www.zmag.org/books/3/3.htm

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
  - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
  - From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
Next by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread