OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

At 02:00 PM 5/12/2002 -0400, Mike Champion wrote:
>Nevertheless, if WG's don't define what the minimum interoperability
>profile for a spec is, someone else will step in to do it for

For XQuery, some people have suggested the following conformance levels:

1. Some implementations use only built-in types, and can not import a schema.
2. Some implementations may not be able to do static type checking.

Do those seem like reasonable conformance levels?

What would be the appropriate conformance levels for XPath 2.0? Or should 
XPath 2.0 be a small conformance level in its own right, without the 
ability to import a schema or do static type checking, and without all of 
the productions of XQuery?



News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS