[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 6:45 AM -0700 5/13/02, Jonathan Robie wrote:
>At 02:00 PM 5/12/2002 -0400, Mike Champion wrote:
>>Nevertheless, if WG's don't define what the minimum interoperability
>>profile for a spec is, someone else will step in to do it for
>>them.
>
>For XQuery, some people have suggested the following conformance levels:
>
>1. Some implementations use only built-in types, and can not import a schema.
>2. Some implementations may not be able to do static type checking.
>
What do you mean by "built-in types"? What typing information would
be used for parsed input documents?
--
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) |
| http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ |
| Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
