Lists Home |
Date Index |
- To: "Thomas B. Passin" <email@example.com>,<firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Re: datatype non-proliferation and disarmament
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 14:55:55 -0700
- Thread-index: AcH65fAsjg51DWh1SlKappS9pq1FVAAq7hCA
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Re: datatype non-proliferation and disarmament
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas B. Passin [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 6:23 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: datatype non-proliferation and disarmament
> I assume the next question is why xs:integer is not a
> primitive in W3C XML Schema to which the answer is that it is
> derived from xs:decimal
> What exactly is your problem with this?
> [Tom P]
> Aside from the fact that it is mathematically wrong, even if
> lexically OK? I was shocked when first I saw this derivation
> in the Schema Rec.
There are many of the decisions made by the W3C XML Schema WG that
disturb me, currently my favorite is the PSVI, yet somehow I am
particularly nonchalant about that one.
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
The meek shall inherit the earth because the bold will get the house.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All