[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 9:23 PM -0400 5/13/02, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
>I assume the next question is why xs:integer is not a primitive in W3C
>XML Schema to which the answer is that it is derived from xs:decimal
>
>What exactly is your problem with this?
>
>[Tom P]
>
>Aside from the fact that it is mathematically wrong, even if lexically OK?
I don't see an objection on mathematical grounds. The integers are a
proper subset of the rational numbers. Why would you claim this is
*mathematically* wrong?
--
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) |
| http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ |
| Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
