[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
No, your previous example is correct. That is exactly what I wanted. I was
just representing the *effective* content model of Book1.
Anyways, thanks.
thanks and regards - murali.
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Michael Leditschke wrote:
> Book1 doesn't look like an extension, but a new
> type containing an element of type Book.
>
> Maybe I've misunderstood?
>
> Regards
> Michael
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Murali Mani [mailto:mani@CS.UCLA.EDU]
> > Sent: Sunday, 19 May 2002 2:11 AM
> > To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> > Subject: [xml-dev] Question regarding extension..
> >
> >
> >
> > Is this extension valid??
> >
> > type Book -> (Title, Author*)
> > type Book1 extends Book -> (Book, Title)
> >
> > thanks and regards - murali.
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> >
> > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> >
>
|
