[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Title: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: R ESTTutorial)
Actually, this was a reference to the penguins.
My
sense of humour can be slightly obtuse before my first 6
coffees.
John
If
you cite an application, it is given a decent spec for that application.
If
you spec, XML, you are quite right.
That
is exactly the point.
Now,
for those in the XML system tools business, a different problem
is
occurring. The specs from the W3C are insufficiently modular to
enable you to spec tools according to finely granular requirements.
That
makes it a hard business for anyone without deep pockets.
That
is Simon's point and he is right.
len
From: Anderson, John
[mailto:John@Barbadosoft.com]
Unfortunately, XML isn't quite so black and white.
The information transmitted by this e-mail message is intended solely for the use of the person to whom or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Disclosure, dissemination, distribution, review, retransmission to, other use of or taking any action in reliance upon this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disseminate, distribute or copy this communication, by e-mail or otherwise. Instead, please notify us immediately by return e-mail (including the original message with your reply) and then delete and discard all copies of the message.
Although we have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting viruses we nevertheless advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We accept no liability for any loss or damage caused by viruses.
|
