RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

Ok.  John is the expert.   

Please elaborate on how RELAX is more powerful than XSD.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@reutershealth.com]

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:

> Don't overlook RELAX RNG.  Despite it's status 
> vis a vis the W3C, I think it has a future as 
> the "easier to do and easier to explain" schema 
> language with a little less than XSD and a 
> bit more than DTDs.

Make that "more power than DTDs or XSD, minus a few obfuscating
features of each."