[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Raw XML laying around is a static database with all the signposts
one needs to get information from it. One presumes that isn't what
the article is talking about. Encrypted XML might also have signposts
that enable it to be easier to crack. I don't know but that would
be what one might want to explore.
But the article is basically an ad for gear and software. Taken
at that level, it is just FUD. If there are problems with encrypting
XML that make it easier to crack, then there is a problem. I don't
know and this isn't my field of expertise.
Ask the crackers.
len
From: Seairth Jacobs [mailto:seairth@seairth.com]
Okay, maybe I am slow to see what's wrong here, but I don't see what's wrong
here. I have questions about the security solution presented, but isn't the
problem itself legitimate? If it isn't, would someone be kind enough to
educate me why a self-describing data file is not an easier target for data
theft?
|
