[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> a.) As Uche pointed out, the question also involves whether node
> identity or the text values of nodes are used. Your technique works
> for identity based equivalence tests but not value based tests
>
Yes of course. If you want value based set equality that's
not($b[. != $a]) and not($a[. != $b])
> b.) Calling count() four times instead of having an explicit operator
> is bad form both performance wise and readability wise.
No disagreement there, but you did't say it wasn't pretty, you said it
wasn't possible.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
|
