[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Derek Denny-Brown" <derekdb@microsoft.com>,"Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@wyeast.net>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] RE: RELAX NG and type derivation [Was:] XQuery and DTD/Schema?
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:21:58 -0700
- Thread-index: AcIjhxL7aZMRxydGS8yBWAZscAlOKQCeHIr/ACj4NkA=
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] RE: RELAX NG and type derivation [Was:] XQuery and DTD/Schema?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derek Denny-Brown
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:06 AM
> To: Michael Fitzgerald; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: [xml-dev] RE: RELAX NG and type derivation [Was:]
> XQuery and DTD/Schema?
>
> Also note, that I am not even remotely defending WXS as a
> complete, well-designed, nor elegant spec. It just is, and
> it achieves certain things which people wanted.
For those out there that may not know what W3C XML Schema was supposed to achieve I suggest looking at the requirements from 1999[0] particularly the structures[1] and data types[2] sections
[0] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-xml-schema-req
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-xml-schema-req#Structural
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-xml-schema-req#Datatype
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Lynch's Law: When the going gets tough, everyone leaves.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|
