Lists Home |
Date Index |
- To: "Julian Reschke" <email@example.com>,"Julian Reschke" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,"J. David Eisenberg" <email@example.com>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Browser support of XML standards (WAS: RE:Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to...)
- From: "Manos Batsis" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:42:33 +0300
- Cc: <email@example.com>
- Thread-index: AcIn/NK4aErBhMPUTze+KZiAiNX44QAAM1yg
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Browser support of XML standards (WAS: RE:Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to...)
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> > From: Manos Batsis [mailto:email@example.com]
> > Because IE behaves quite differently based on whether it
> anticipates the
> > document as XML or HTML.
> Sure. But what you describe is the effect of IE working in
> two different
> "modes", XML and HTML (which sadly tries to handle XHTML as
> well). But the
> fact that the XML parser is external is irrelevant, I'd say...
My impression is that the two "modes" are so deeply separated due to the
*nature* of the msxml component, not just the fact that it is external.