xml-dev - question: can anyone give me a reason why OWL should have datatypes?

question: can anyone give me a reason why OWL should have datatypes?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: question: can anyone give me a reason why OWL should have datatypes?
From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:23:01 +0200
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <D0F1529EE943B3449F755CA1A40887465B3FD4@winserver.windomain.mozquito.com>


So I was looking over Owl
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-webont-req-20020708/

When I found yet another case of interlock with WXSDL(under
section-use-cases; R15. Complex data types). The motivations given were
compatibility with other standards, and ease of use.

Anyone excited about this and think it's a good idea?
Anyone over-excited by this and think it's the worst idea since
one-dimensional bread?
I got a gut reaction that immediately spun me into the second camp, am
looking to climb out and learn to smile, smile again.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] question: can anyone give me a reason why OWL shouldhave datatypes?
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead,istheresome other standard that should be looked at
  - From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@mozquito.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Browser support of XML standards (WAS: RE:Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to...)
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead,istheresome other standard that should be looked at
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead,istheresome other standard that should be looked at
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] question: can anyone give me a reason why OWL shouldhave datatypes?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread