[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
In article <000701c228c6$b7696ad0$6401a8c0@pcukmka> you write:
><doc xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace"/>
The legality of this was recently confirmed in an erratum to the
Namespaces spec, which also resolves some other doubtful questions
about reserved prefixes and namespaces. See:
http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-names-19990114-errata#NE05
>AElfred accepts it, and doesn't notify the namespace to the SAX2
>ContentHandler.
>Piccolo accepts it, and does notify the namespace to the SAX2
>ContentHandler.
According to http://www.saxproject.org/apidoc/index.html,
There should never be start/endPrefixMapping events for the "xml"
prefix, since it is predeclared and immutable.
I notice that it doesn't say there whether redundant prefix bindings in
general are reported, eg in
<a:foo xmlns:a="example.org">
<a:bar xmlns:a="example.org">
...
-- Richard
|
