[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Hi Patrick,
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 12:44, Patrick Durusau wrote:
> Would not necessarily even require context-free parsers. Imagine (you
> can do this with SAX) that you specify rules that consume markup by
> namespaces (well, at least namespaces as in classic concur). Certainly
> could validate an XML document that is not "well-formed" through the
> various namespaces.
Yes, your presentation at XML Europe 2002 made it perfectly clear that
it is not *that* natural to build namespaces on top of "tree markup" but
might be as natural (and as usefull too) to build "tree markup" of top
of namespaces and I must say I had never had such a clear perception of
this issue before.
Thanks for opening my eyes :-)
Eric
--
See you in San Diego.
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2002/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
