[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
John Cowan wrote:
> "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:
> > It is also why namespaces do not belong
> > in the core but should be the first thing to the right of the
> > + (XML 1.0 + Namespaces + ...)
>
> On the contrary. The Namespace Rec simply adds the ability to have
> URI-syntax strings in element type names and attribute names
Hm.
This is the clearest explanation of what the XML Namespaces REC
does and doesn't do that I've heard to date.
> without breaking SGML backward compatibility.
But surely there are other considerations besides just that!
I know "terseness is of minimal importance" and all,
but really!
--Joe English
jenglish@flightlab.com
|
