[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:
> That is PRECISELY why XML is a syntax specification
> and nothing more.
Well, almost. It also puts certain restrictions (some in the XML Rec,
some not) on what XML processors report to applications. For example,
attribute values cannot be dropped on the floor, nor can PIs.
> It is also why namespaces do not belong
> in the core but should be the first thing to the right of the
> + (XML 1.0 + Namespaces + ...)
On the contrary. The Namespace Rec simply adds the ability to have
URI-syntax strings in element type names and attribute names without
breaking SGML backward compatibility. It is pure syntax.
What you decide to *use* the capability for, if anything, is another matter.
--
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com http://www.reutershealth.com
"Mr. Lane, if you ever wish anything that I can do all you will have to do
will be to send me a telegram asking and it will be done."
"Mr. Hearst, if you ever get a telegram from me asking
you to do anything you can put the telegram down as a forgery."
|
