[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> > We've had some admirable projects here, but
> > you'll have to count
> > me out of this one. I'll answer specific, well-bounded
> > questions when I'm able.
> >
>
> And can I suggest, Uche, that when someone asks a question that you
> aren't interested in, you should ignore it rather than trying to mock
> it?
Normally I do. This question was baited. YYou won't get me to regret taking
the bait. Sorry.
> It was a perfectly reasonable question. I didn't answer it (a) because
> it was too hard, and (b) because I have colleagues who earn their living
> getting large fees for answering such questions.
>
> It's the guys who have to work out how to deploy this technology that
> are the ones who pay our salaries and allow us to enjoy our esoteric
> discussions on the semantics of URIs. Never forget that.
1) This sort of thinking would disallow any criticism of governmments,
corporations (not even those who cook the books) or any other person or entity
in a position of some authority.
2) If I follow you, the sorts who pay your salary are very different from thhe
sorts who pay mine.
Oh well, back to esoterics.
--
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Track chair, XML/Web Services One Boston: http://www.xmlconference.com/
The many heads of XML modeling - http://adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6393
Will XML live up to its promise? - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/li
brary/x-think11.html
|
