[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>,"Miles Sabin" <miles@milessabin.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] URIs harmful (was RE: [xml-dev] Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 19:11:11 -0700
- Thread-index: AcIxiv921gahRmRRQLqUQddo/hm3+wAYpEHg
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] URIs harmful (was RE: [xml-dev] Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@ingr.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 7:20 AM
> To: 'Miles Sabin'; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] URIs harmful (was RE: [xml-dev]
> Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
>
>
> In Internet Explorer, it returns among other things,
>
> 11004 - Host not found
>
> Yes. I consider that a resolution. It made the
> attempt and found a document to return.
>
No it didn't:
$ wget http://this.host.does.not.exist/
--19:06:00-- http://this.host.does.not.exist/
=> `index.html'
Resolving this.host.does.not.exist... failed: Host not found.
$ telnet http://this.host.does.not.exist/ 80
http://this.host.does.not.exist/: No address associated with name
Getting an error message in Internet Explorer does not count as
retrieving a document to me not does it to WGET, TELNET or any other
mechanism I'd use to dereference that URL.
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
He who laughs last didn't catch on very fast, did he?
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
|