RE: [xml-dev] XML IDE: What are the top 3 and why?

["Don Box" <dbox@microsoft.com>]

I and most of my friends use Emacs. The NT version has been pretty
stable for at least a year, and the built-in SGML mode has proven more
than functional (for me at least). I know of at least one person who
likes the XSLT mode for Emacs, but I didn't care for it.

BTW, the price is hard to complain about.

DB


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Long, Craig Z [mailto:craig.long@eds.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 9:17 AM
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: [xml-dev] XML IDE: What are the top 3 and why?
> 
>  XML-Dev,
> 
> I'm currently using XML Spy 4.3 and am pleased with it.  Please
suggest
> other note worthy XML development tools (ideally the top 3-5) that are
> comparable to XMLSpy (price/functionality).  As you know developers
often
> find themselves having to justify the purchase of a tool and what
tool.
> Thanks for your expert opinion.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> /**
>  *
>  * @author Craig
>  * @Developer
>  * @Ever Vigilant!!!
>  *
>  */
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>