Lists Home |
Date Index |
Rick Jelliffe scripsit:
> Why not try that minimal solution first, and see if it works?
> (And why not do it as a corrigendum rather than 1.1)
I keep telling you why. Because it changes the definition of well-formedness.
A document like "<foo<NEL>bar=baz> is not WF XML 1.0, but it is WF XML 1.1.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)