Re: [xml-dev] version numbers and infosets

[John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

Rick Jelliffe scripsit:

> Why not try that minimal solution first, and see if it works? 
> 
> (And why not do it as a corrigendum rather than 1.1)

I keep telling you why.  Because it changes the definition of well-formedness.
A document like "<foo<NEL>bar=baz> is not WF XML 1.0, but it is WF XML 1.1.

-- 
John Cowan       http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
        You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
        You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
                Clear all so!  `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)