[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I would have commented but given that the article is over a year old, it
is unlikely that any debate will ensue. If XML.com is interested in an
article revisiting Kohsuke Kawaguchi's points you can email me offlist.
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Old cars never die, they just smell that way.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edd Dumbill [mailto:edd@usefulinc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 1:29 AM
> To: XML-DEV
>
> On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 15:34, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> > Many statements in his article indicate his bias[0]. What
> more do you
> > want, a point by point rebuttal in a counter-article on XML.com?
>
> While I think that XML.com gives enough air-time to articles
> showing many 'conventional' and innovative approaches to WXS,
> something you are helping me with, there is always the
> comment facility at the bottom of the article in which you
> can make your objections public.
>
> Thoughtful and lively debate has always been something
> XML.com welcomes.
>
> -- Edd
>
|
