xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]

RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'Thomas B. Passin'" <tpassin@comcast.net>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:13:35 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <016401c25e0e$f48316a0$fe193044@tbp1>

Hi Thomas,

Thomas said:
If we cannot get to a **really simple** syntax to express these notions,
one
that will be clear to most non-specialists and non-nerd html authors, we
better forget it right now.  And it should have few options and no
interactions between parts.  I know that this does not sound like a
general
replacement for xlink, but I think it is what is needed for xhtml.

Does anyone else think like this, or is it just me?

Didier replies:
Totally agree with this Thomas.

Cheers
Didier PH Martin

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Don't Let Architecture Astronauts Scare You
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration languages]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread