Lists Home |
Date Index |
Ann Navarro wrote:
> Why use any agreed upon XML vocabulary? Why not just use raw XML all
> the time?
By far the best post of this thread.
Currently, (X)HTML is mostly used for presentational purposes alone. I
would agree that in 90% of cases, XML+XLink+CSS2+ECMAScript should be
used to do what (X)HTML does today.
Mozilla can be thought of as a platform based on this approach. It goes
even further, as XBL covers the rest 10% of use cases...