Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]

[Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>]

At 02:09 PM 9/17/2002 -0400, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>At 1:13 PM -0700 9/17/02, Ann Navarro wrote:
>
>>XHTML 2.0 is an XML application, and is not going to be based upon an 
>>assumed arcane knowledge of it's semantics, or a requirement for 
>>hard-wired DTDs. Let's stop that assumption quickly.
>
>
>The why define XHTML 2.0 at all? Why not just use raw XML?

Why use any agreed upon XML vocabulary? Why not just use raw XML all the time?

Ann