Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]

["Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>]

[Elliotte Rusty Harold]

> At 10:00 AM -0400 9/17/02, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
>
>
> >RDDL would almost be an example of this approach. And the xlink namespace
> >could be a default namespace, so the prefix would not have to be typed.
>
> No, that wouldn't work because you can't use the default namespace on
> attributes, which must be prefixed. :-(
> --

Blush - and I actually know better, too.  I wonder where was I when I wrote
that???

Tom P