OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration languages]

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

At 4:43 AM +0000 9/18/02, Arjun Ray wrote:

>have to *share* data values (as in html:href "versus" xlink:href).  It
>tries to make virtue out of necessity - if not dogma out of principle -
>when multiple linking semantics in the same element become impossible *due
>to syntax*.

XLink does not rule out multiple linking semantics in the same 
*element*. It rules out multiple linking semantics in the same *tag*. 
The distinction is very important.

What I am hearing people say they need is multiple linking semantics 
in the same *element*. I am also hearing them object because they 
can't have multiple linking semantics in the same *tag*. I am still 
waiting for a convincing use-case that requires multiple linking 
semantics in the same *tag*.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+




 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS