[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev] XOM micro tutorial)
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:40:57 -0700
- Thread-index: AcJhdtrddPWTOjKrRfqsa3e8zofo5QAFVf3C
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev] XOM micro tutorial)
We shipped this functionality in the .NET framework and I use it all the time. Search for the string "InnerXml" in the text at http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/9/14/19753/0994
-----Original Message-----
From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu]
Sent: Sat 9/21/2002 6:36 AM
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Cc:
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Underwhelmed (WAS: [xml-dev] XOM micro tutorial)
At 9:13 PM -0700 9/20/02, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> - Can't insert XML strings directly into the tree
What do you mean by this? Are you saying
element.appendChild("<p>Hello</p>") should attach a p child to
element?
I can't say this appeals to me. You might be able to come up with a
logically consistent model where this makes sense, but I don't see
it. Most of the people who want to do this appear to be confusing
text and markup. Still, it would be an interesting approach for
somebody to experiment with.
|