[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> wrote:
| Arjun Ray scripsit:
|> Wouldn't it be better to have the PI target imply the *presence* of a
|> notation reference within the body, as per some internal *syntax* which
|> it would be the purpose of the target to identify?
|
| I don't follow you.
The difference between
<?foo ...?>
and
<?xmlbar foo ... ?>
where 'foo' by intent is a name in a notation declaration, where this
syntactic understanding is captured in a formal specification of the
meaning of a reserved word such as 'xmlbar'. See, e.g.,
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=8f984tspdol3789jrji9eptdtt5cacflje@4ax.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=uah54tcuuebuf51a364n1jq1faufrnmd1r@4ax.com
|
